Uncertainty evaluation of SWAT model for snowmelt runoff in a Himalayan watershed

  • Author(s): Tanveer Abbas, Fiaz Hussain, Ghulam Nabi, Muhammad Waseem Boota, and Ray-Shyan Wu
  • DOI: 10.3319/TAO.2018.10.08.01
  • Keywords: SWAT Snowmelt Uncertainty SUFI 2 Elevation Bands
  • Citation: Abbas, T., F. Hussain, G. Nabi, M. W. Boota, and R.-S. Wu, 2019: Uncertainty evaluation of SWAT model for snowmelt runoff in a Himalayan watershed. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 30, 265-279, doi: 10.3319/TAO.2018.10.08.01
  • SWAT model was applied to the high altitude Himalayan watershed (2001-2009)
  • Model results improved significantly when elevation bands are considered
  • The SUFI-2 algorithm was used to quantify the associated uncertainty

Uncertainty is inherent in modeling studies. However, the quantification of uncertainties associated with a model is a challenging task. Furthermore, snowmelt estimation is a crucial part of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model in watersheds where spring runoff is strongly affected by melting snow. The SWAT model for the snow dependent Kunhar basin in Himalayan watershed was calibrated (2001 - 2005) and validated (2006 - 2009) using Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Algorithm (SUFI-2). For the model uncertainty, two indices P-factor and R-factor along with frequently used objective functions R2, NSE, PBIAS, were taken into consideration. For calibration, multisite daily and monthly simulation results of SUFI-2 revealed that percentage of data enveloped by 95% confidence interval was 85% (monthly) to 87% (daily) at upstream calibration point and 63% (monthly) to 73% (daily) data at the downstream calibration point. Model validation by the usage of elevation bands indicated better model performance, enveloping 15 - 20% more observed data than the validation without elevation bands together with the other statistical standards. Equifinality in the model parameters was observed, and it was discovered that the model uncertainty lie inside the model parameters. It is recommended that critical model parameters correspondence with the watershed characteristics should be checked. The calibrated version of the model could be further used for the analysis and impacts of climate and land use changes on stream flows, water quality and sediment yield.

Read 3831 times
© 1990-2033 Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (TAO). All rights reserved.

Published by The Chinese Geoscience Union